Search for: "Nounes v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 117
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2014, 3:00 pm
" United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am
United States, 13-7120 (ditto); Zivotofsky v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 9:29 am
See United States v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 8:08 pm
Unfortunately, the consensus of United States legal authority on what is generic rather than descriptive, and vice-versa, has become somewhat discordant. . . . [read post]
8 May 2013, 2:31 pm
as modifying only the noun or phrase that it immediately follows,” Barnhart v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 6:18 am
I begin with this post, which first appeared here in October 2009, called "The Church, (P)ECUSA and the DFMS", with newly updated links and facts:* * * *I have been asked to explain the difference between "the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America" and the "Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America." [read post]
29 Dec 2012, 7:58 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 5:36 am
United States, 265 F.3d 1371, 1375 (Fed. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 5:36 am
United States, 265 F.3d 1371, 1375 (Fed. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
United California Bank, 350 F. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:14 pm
(Orin Kerr) Today in United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 2:11 pm
In United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:02 pm
Yesterday the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit released its opinion in Latif v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 10:16 am
This was the conundrum facing the US Supreme Court is the case of United States v Alvarez, concerning the constitutionality of the 2006 “Stolen Valor Act”. [read post]
17 May 2012, 10:00 am
McPhee meant to use was "course," a noun meaning path. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 7:37 am
Nokia Corporation v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 7:53 pm
Chandresekhara Thevar, AIR 1948 PC 12 and (iii) Secy. of State for India v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 11:01 am
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1). [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm
The United States Supreme Court in Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 5:39 pm
Not so, the Chief Justice said:The adjectival form of a word need not take its meaning from the noun form. [read post]
