Search for: "OPINION OF THE JUSTICES TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES"
Results 81 - 100
of 3,675
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
He had previously cooperated with a Justice Department investigation into whether Gaetz had engaged in sex trafficking of a minor. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
, this recent OLC opinion, discussing whether state abortion restrictions can bind statutorily authorized actions of federal agencies.) [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
To McReynolds, law represented the “spontaneous self-ordering of society itself. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
Thornton, because two-thirds of both Houses of Congress might still vote to remove the Section 3 disqualification for Trump if he’s elected. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 7:35 pm
Since then, the bill has passed the state Senate but failed in the House of Representatives due to disagreements about the particulars of the act. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
The officer’s attorney represented the officer in all three cases. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 7:39 pm
A House committee rejected that claim but noted that members of Congress might not be officers of the United States under other constitutional provisions. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
" Diminishing Chase Justice Sotomayor tried to diminish the relevance of Chase's opinion. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
Gessler zealously represented his client. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
On February 7, 1861, six days before the certification of Lincoln's electoral vote, Representative Henry Winter Davis proclaimed on the House floor that "cabinet ministers have violated their oaths by organizing insurrection. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
Chase ruled in a circuit opinion that the clause was not self-executing. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
In Term Limits, the Court held both (i) that a state may not impose extraconstitutional conditions for holding federal office (such as, there, that a member of the House of Representatives from Arkansas not have already served more than three terms in the House), id. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
In Term Limits, the Court held both (i) that a state may not impose extraconstitutional conditions for holding federal office (such as, there, that a member of the House of Representatives from Arkansas not have already served more than three terms in the House), id. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
In this post, I’ll discuss the first of the CRSCC’s off-ramp arguments, which invokes Chief Justice Chase’s opinion in In re Griffin, 11 F. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 4:54 am
House Representatives, as appearing to argue that that Section Three of the proposed Fourteenth Amendment was not legally self-executing – that is, that Section Three would not have direct and immediate legal effect as a constitutional rule unless and until Congress adopted further implementing legislation. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:59 am
But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
To decide an abstract question is to give what has been deemed, since the Washington administration, an impermissible advisory opinion. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
(We express no opinion here on whether the Saxbe fix comports with the Sinecure Clause.) [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
