Search for: "Oxford v. Chance" Results 81 - 100 of 134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2017, 9:03 am by Ronald Collins
Seiner provides a framework that practitioners can use to navigate these murky waters, allowing workers a better chance of prevailing with their claims. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
The three trials are as follows: 5 April 2016, Umeyor v Ibe, 5 days; 18 April 2016, Undre v London Borough of Harrow, 2 days.;  23 May 2016, Theedom v Nourish Training, 3-4 days. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:00 pm by Joel R. Brandes
After graduating from Georgetown University, she attended graduate school at Oxford University in England and remained in England for much of her adult life. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 10:07 am by Ernie Svenson
Long before Oxford asked me to write this book, I had dissected the Chief Justice John Roberts’s brief in Alaska v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
The US Supreme Court rejected such an argument in Arkansas Educational Television Commission v Forbes (1998). [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 5:01 am
As of today, this blog, led by Simone Blakeney (Clifford Chance LLP) and Rosie Burbidge (Olswang LLP), has 231 email subscribers and a searchable database of 136 items. [read post]
8 May 2012, 12:36 pm by Anup Surendranath
Perhaps the question stood no chance given that it was being put to a panel where 6 out of 7 speakers were inheriting the political legacies of their families.Panellists seemed more willing to introspect when posed a question on the institutional reforms needed to make Parliament functional again. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 8:27 pm
As of today, this blog, led by Simone Blakeney (Clifford Chance LLP) and Rosie Burbidge (Rouse Legal), has 266 email subscribers and a searchable database of 170 items. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 10:51 am by Dennis Hirsch
Richards’ book, Intellectual Privacy, will be published by the Oxford University Press in January 2015. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 12:02 pm by Kevin Smith, J.D.
So does the petition from the publishers stand a chance? [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am by INFORRM
If the distinction in cl.4(2) were not drawn in the way that it is, it could in principle entail an enhanced personal right to access information including governmental information (see in this context the discussion in Kennedy v Information Commissioner [2015] AC 455 (SC)). [read post]