Search for: "P. C. Wolf" Results 81 - 100 of 199
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2016, 12:47 pm by Dykema
” Under Section 8 of RESPA, “[p]ayments for referrals are proscribed, but payments for other services actually performed are permitted, so long as the payments reflect reasonable market value. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 8:17 am by Quinta Jurecic
Wednesday, August 16th at 7:30pm: At the Westminster Institute, former Congressman Frank Wolf will speak on Nigeria and Boko Haram. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 7:58 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Conference: Debitore, Creitore E Primonio: Legisazioni A Confronto; “La aplicación del Código de Quiebra de los EEUU en un sistema de Derecho Civil”, conference Banco de Italia – UniCredit, Rome, 10-12 February 2011. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Amazon EU Sàrl (Case C-191/15) concerns the concept of establishment under the Data Protection Directive.. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:31 pm by Denis Stearns
Calder L, Simmons G, Thornley C, Taylor P, Pritchard K, Greening G, Bishop J. (2003). [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 8:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  The “partnership” email sent to 22 clients used that language at Wolf’s suggestion. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:26 am
Contents include:Research ArticlesRicardo Ffrench-Davis, Kevin P. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:13 am by MBettman
Subsection (C) (1) states punitive damages are not recoverable unless the actions of that defendant demonstrate malice or aggravated or egregious fraud or there was ratification by a principal.) [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 8:09 pm by Patti Waller
Calder L, Simmons G, Thornley C, Taylor P, Pritchard K, Greening G, Bishop J. (2003). [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
 * Gardens in the Internal Market are big enough for another wolfA little over a year ago we left Case C-383/12 P Environmental Manufacturing LLP v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Société Elmar Wolf [reported here in the IPKat] and the Court of Justice of the European Union making it clear to the General Court that 'what it said explicitly was what it meant'. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
A little over a year ago we left Case C-383/12 P Environmental Manufacturing LLP v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Société Elmar Wolf – reported here in the IPKat – and the Court of Justice making it clear to the General Court that 'what it said explicitly was what it meant'. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
The most-consulted French-language decision was Tremblay c. [read post]