Search for: "P. v. Case" Results 81 - 100 of 25,567
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2024, 10:30 pm by Jesse Peters
In line with previous case law such as In ‘t Veld v Council, the Court required [read post]
20 May 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
The Second Circuit in particular has grappled with this question in cases like Public Service Employees Union Pension Trust Fund v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:40 am by David Pozen
By contrast, Paul-Emile’s theory might suggest a revisionist reading of Gonzales v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:24 am by Tom Dannenbaum
This a remarkably comprehensive set of allegations and represents an unprecedented level of transparency at this stage of a case at the ICC. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
  It is of course too early for a substantive decision on validity and infringement in the first cases filed, most cases taking at least 12 months to reach a hearing. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am by Matthias Weller
In fact, – in addition to the cases from the transition period – the choice of law rules of the Rome I and Rome II-Regulations previously incorporated into the domestic law, remained applicable as so-called retained EU law (REUL) due to their universal character (loi uniforme).[15] However, this approach was not appropriate for legal acts revolving around the principle of reciprocity, particularly in International Civil Procedure.[16] Hence, a legal stocktaking… [read post]
17 May 2024, 2:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Gopstein v Bellinson Law, LLC 2024 NY Slip Op 02592 Decided on May 09, 2024Appellate Division, First Department, which we discussed this week for the legal malpractice portion of the case, also had a Judiciary Law 487 component. [read post]
16 May 2024, 2:09 pm by Dylan Gibbs
Assuming the City appeals, this case will be one to watch. [read post]
16 May 2024, 8:30 am by Tabatha Abu El-Haj
The Supreme Court has decided Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm by Ryan Goodman
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Under CPLR 3026, "[p]leadings shall be liberally construed" and "[d]efects shall be ignored if a substantial right of a party is not prejudiced" (Matter of Augostini v Bernstein, 172 AD3d 1946, 1947 [4th Dept 2019]).Accordingly, the matter is remanded for further proceedings, including a determination of whether respondent's answer was properly served.THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST… [read post]