Search for: "P. v. Howard" Results 81 - 100 of 469
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 22 and 23 July 2019 the same judge heard the trial in the case of Fentiman v Marsh. [read post]
In August 2018, an action was filed with the San Francisco Superior Court to invalidate this tax by, among others, the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am by MOTP
But then Howard went on to state, "This case, for whatever reason, has not been worked up in a reasonable fashion. . . . [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am by MOTP
But then Howard went on to state, "This case, for whatever reason, has not been worked up in a reasonable fashion. . . . [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 8:47 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
[emphasis added] This is the same approach employed by Justice Sharpe in Griffin v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm by admin
The Relevance and Admissibility of Rezoning and Comparable Sales Occurring After the Date of Taking, When Determining the Value of Condemned Property by Alan T. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9  See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co v. [read post]