Search for: "P. v. Parodi"
Results 81 - 100
of 167
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2014, 12:49 pm
These procedures are ”particularly useful as they directly concern freedom of expression” when the use is a parody or a citation (p.73). [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
5 May 2014, 6:16 am
He analyzes the data and information provided by de Beer and Bouchard and suggests that the Board’s unlocatable regime is “a radical shift from the mechanism contemplated by Parliament (or, perhaps more precisely, such a subversion of that mechanism)” (at p. 1329). [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 1:14 pm
He submitted that current interpretation of fair use, eg Cariou v Prince, is different from what fair use used to be, say, 20 years ago] should be imported into these laws - as well as different approaches that have arisen in the course of these processes. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 2:08 pm
” Well, yesterday the court indeed rejected the lieutenant governor’s request for a preliminary injunction; see Dardenne v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 11:47 am
Courts recognize this, for instance holding that use of trademarks in parodies is generally unlikely to cause confusion; see, for instance, Lyons Partnership v. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in Campbell v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:16 am
Lorang, 992 P.2d 496, 501 (Wash. 2000) (rejecting the view that a ban on “profane” speech could be subject to lower scrutiny as a content-neutral restriction). [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 2:07 pm
Afghanistan: A Distant War Robert Nickelsberg; Foreword by Jon Lee Anderson; Introduction by Ahmad Nader Nadery Prestel USA (2013) The Cruel Radiance: Photography and Political Violence Susie Linfield University of Chicago (2012) By mid-20th century, photography had evolved from its 19th century origins as a rarified domain of professional photographers into a technology of the masses; the Kodak Instamatic generation embraced the “decisive moment” through the power of emulsion. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:43 am
They’re also obviously at risk of simply describing, in a laudatory manner, characteristics of the goods or services in question.CJEU Cases C-398/08 P Audi AG v OHIM (VORSPRUNG DURCH TECHNIK) and C-311/11 P Smart Technologies ULC v OHIM (WIR MACHEN DAS BESONDERE EINFACH), already blogged by Jeremy hereand here, set out the position in Europe. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm
See infra p. 6. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 6:13 am
Don’t miss the “Etiquette for Ironworkers” parody legal memo on p. 58, either. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 3:35 pm
The full decision can be read at: Decision [1]Salinger v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 5:14 am
Hart v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 6:28 am
EMI Catalogue P’ship v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:33 am
Tuesday, Ben bemoaned the state of drone-themed humor in the New York Times, and followed it up yesterday morning with a tale of national security parody gone awry. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
The Court, referring to its 2007 Grand Chamber judgment in Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 6:35 am
Consider this parody ad that appeared in a humor magazine called Snickers: The case was Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am
P. 52(b), which it did not do. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:36 pm
Janky v. [read post]
