Search for: "POL V. STATE" Results 81 - 100 of 555
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2012, 4:47 am
& Pol'y 233, 250 n.64 (2011), a publication based on a lecture about which we've posted here and here.As students of international law well know, the case was Nicaragua v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The “law enforcement exemption” in POL §87(2) (e) (iv) is not applicable to FOIL requests for documents that might result in administrative disciplinary action2015 NY Slip Op 04356, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentDepartment of Taxation and Finance [Department] undertook a department-wide audit to identify employees who had overstated their job-related expense deductions on their personal income tax returns. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The “law enforcement exemption” in POL §87(2) (e) (iv) is not applicable to FOIL requests for documents that might result in administrative disciplinary action2015 NY Slip Op 04356, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentDepartment of Taxation and Finance [Department] undertook a department-wide audit to identify employees who had overstated their job-related expense deductions on their personal income tax returns. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 5:00 am by Howard Friedman
Int'l L & Pol'y 22 (2015)).From SSRN (Islamic Law):Jill Wilson, Linda S. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 4:50 pm by Steven Boutwell
By Ed Hardin On April 2, 2018, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Encino Motorcars, LLC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 1:07 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Court, after reviewing the documents in camera, finds that the NYPD has met its burden of proving exemption for these reports akin to Johnson v New York City Police Department. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 3:03 am
NEW YORK STATE COURT OF APPEALS Free: Rents on Stuyvesant Complex Units Were Illegally Decontrolled Government Settlement Agreement Terms Statutorily Protected; FOIL Disclosure Exempted Under POL §87(2)(a) Matter of McFerrin-Clancy v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 5:45 am by Ted Frank
Some of the better Wal-Mart v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:51 am
Distinguishing the House of Lords decision in Denny-Mott and Dixon v James Fraser and Co, the judge held that the contract between the Club and IRISL was to provide indemnity insurance and that "[p]art of that purpose remained lawful. [read post]