Search for: "POM Wonderful, LLC" Results 81 - 100 of 190
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2014, 2:14 pm by Oyez Project
The Court heard arguments this week in: POM Wonderful, LLC v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 1:29 pm
”  Observing that “[t]he FDA allows the manufacturer to make this decision in the first instance,” 2014 WL 3536573, at *3, the court refused to be drawn into the thicket of making safety and effectiveness decisions under the guise of Lanham Act enforcement.As one would expect, the plaintiff argued that this allegation was allowed under POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 2:26 am
The FTC complaint charges that POM Wonderful LLC, sister corporation Roll International Corp., and principals Stewart Resnick, Lynda Resnick, and Matthew Tupper violated federal law by making deceptive disease prevention and treatment claims. [read post]
6 May 2016, 8:10 am by Phyllis H. Marcus and Emma Lewis
Circuit’s January 2015 ruling upholding a 2013 FTC decision finding that POM Wonderful, LLC (“POM”) misled consumers in advertising that its 100% Pomegranate Juice and POMx supplements could prevent, treat or reduce the risk of prostate cancer, heart disease and erectile dysfunction. [read post]
17 May 2012, 1:32 pm
You apparently can't sue someone -- even if you hire a fancy lawyer -- when they deceptively mislabel their juice product. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 3:12 am by Lindsey A. Zahn
The article details the implications the 2014 Supreme Court case POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Kali Borkoski
 At 11:00 a.m. the Justices will hear oral argument in POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]