Search for: "POTTER v DISTRICT COURT" Results 81 - 100 of 280
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2012, 3:44 pm by Todd Ruger
Supreme Court, Justice Potter Stewart jokingly referred to him “as the clerk who wrote the Newman opinion. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 5:58 am by Susan Brenner
District Court for the Southern District of Ohio 2013). [read post]
10 Aug 2008, 4:30 am
United States, the court considered whether a taxpayer could bring a tax-refund suit in a federal district court if he did not first pay all of the taxes sought by the Treasury. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:39 am by Todd Ruger
Also, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted through Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals nominee Robert Bacharach, along with three district court nominees: Paul Grimm for the District of Maryland; John Dowdell for the Northern District of Oklahoma; and Mark Walker for the Northern District of Florida. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 10:03 am
Public Utility District 1 (06-1457) and Calpine Energy Services v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 11:21 am
Potter, 2006 WL 2631722 (W.D. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 7:55 am
  Even Draco got it right every once in awhile, and today, when district courts have several hundred cases on their dockets, there are times when the "draconian" remedy is appropos. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 12:17 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Chicago-Kent College of Law 2020 Supreme Court IP Review: Google v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:22 pm by Michael Fox
Potter (S.Ct. 5/27/08).Supreme Court Answers the Question: What Is An Adverse Employment Action? [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 9:54 pm
”  The Court reversed her conviction, holding that the district court erred in failing to instruct the jury that to be guilty of the offense, Shim had to know, not only that she was transporting the women, but that the women were transported in interstate commerce.Quoting the Supreme Court’s decision in Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 9:08 am
Supreme Court also denies numerous petitions for review with today's orders.FKM Partnership, Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm by Neil Siegel
By 1961, his position had not changed, and he attempted to sway Justice Potter Stewart to his side while Baker v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 5:26 am
Potter, 2004 EEOPUB LEXIS 448 (Feb. 3, 2004) (holding that the settlement agreement between the parties, which included a no‐rehire provision, was enforceable); Jablonski v. [read post]