Search for: "Pennsylvania v. Cost"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,828
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2023, 11:25 am
Supreme Court issued a rare unanimous ruling in Groff v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:56 am
A budget model issued by the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania estimates that the program will cost taxpayers “between $469 billion and $519 billion,” depending on the total number of borrowers ultimately covered. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 1:10 pm
” Last week in Groff v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court observed in Forsyth County v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
Thus, in Bartnicki v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:30 am
S. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 12:09 pm
PENNSYLVANIA COURT RULES THAT EMPLOYERS MUST REIMBURSE OUT-OF-POCKET COSTS FOR MEDICAL CANNABIS IN WORKERS COMPENSATION CASE On March 17, 2023, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court, in the companion cases of Appel v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:35 am
The leading cases in Pennsylvania on this subject dwell on attorney communications and include, Bochetto v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 12:34 pm
See Abernathy v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 6:05 am
However, in Rucho v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 11:30 am
Today's en banc decision in Range v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 12:02 am
Co. v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 6:30 am
In Knox Couty v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 1:48 pm
Aquino v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:30 pm
An example is Ciraolo v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:56 pm
But it is also in part a reflection, effectively, of what might be preferences for mitigation-remediation (or otherwise exit if the costs of prevention exceed the anticipated vale of an activity), at least indifference as between the strategies as a function of expected value. [read post]
10 May 2023, 9:30 pm
(OI, v.1, 331). [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:28 am
Lack of Basis Adjustment Although it may seem special and meaningful to provide a gift to a loved one as your last act, it may come with significant costs to them. [read post]
8 May 2023, 9:30 pm
” (OI, v.1, 228) (emphasis added). [read post]