Search for: "People v Denis"
Results 81 - 100
of 15,800
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Accountability, Inc. v Cuomo, 167 AD3d 1406, 1409 [3d Dept 2018], appeal dismissed 33 NY3d 993 [2019], lv dismissed & denied 34 NY3d 961 [2019]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Accountability, Inc. v Cuomo, 167 AD3d 1406, 1409 [3d Dept 2018], appeal dismissed 33 NY3d 993 [2019], lv dismissed & denied 34 NY3d 961 [2019]). [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:27 am
" The Supreme Court reaffirmed this in Regan v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 4:30 am
However, in Bostock v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 8:39 am
A.J.Z. v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:55 am
In Citizens for Clean Air & Clean Water in Brazoria County et al v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 1:18 pm
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 11:54 am
Supreme Court’s holding in Obergefell v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 6:55 am
In Tuskia v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 3:51 am
They also requested that the number of people with access be limited to 3 staff members. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:00 pm
# # #DECISIONPeople v M. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:42 am
It would be wrong to segregate the deaf movie goer in the real movie theater because it would deny them as much of the shared experience as their disability permits. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:05 am
” At its core, Weinstein’s case simply applied the long-established rules of the more than century-old case of People v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:18 pm
In the case of A.K. v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
[*2]The City actors are the Mayor of the City of New York, the New York City Department of Education, and its Chancellor (collectively the City).Plaintiffs challenge State and City policies that plaintiffs claim deny Black and Latinx [FN3] students their state constitutional right to a "sound basic education" under article XI § 1 (Board of Educ., Levittown Union Free School Dist. v Nyquist, 57 NY2d 27, 48 [1982], appeal dismissed 459 US… [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
[*2]The City actors are the Mayor of the City of New York, the New York City Department of Education, and its Chancellor (collectively the City).Plaintiffs challenge State and City policies that plaintiffs claim deny Black and Latinx [FN3] students their state constitutional right to a "sound basic education" under article XI § 1 (Board of Educ., Levittown Union Free School Dist. v Nyquist, 57 NY2d 27, 48 [1982], appeal dismissed 459 US… [read post]
