Search for: "People v Modest" Results 81 - 100 of 1,152
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2023, 5:55 am by Michael Dreeben
Why, they asked, should unelected Justices be empowered to strike down laws passed by the democratically elected Knesset, which represents the will of the people? [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:51 pm by INFORRM
On 27 February 2023 judgment was handed down in the case of FGX v Gaunt [2023] EWHC 419 (KB). [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 4:41 am by Michael Caruso
”But people accused in federal court obtained the right to counsel twenty-five years earlier in Johnson v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:55 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
First, the amount and duration of the Fernandes litigation was relatively modest, the election just three months late and made almost immediately after the Court denied dismissal of the petition. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 4:32 am by SHG
High profile cases are an entirely different matter, and Judge Lewis Kaplan in U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
In most legal orgs, this percentage is near negligible, especially if the org is being honest with itself about (i) how many personnel in putative innovation roles (legal operations, knowledge management, project management) are consumed by active matters, existing programs, and administration, (ii) how much technology spend is maintenance, and (iii) how many projects are purely aspirational with no real resources save the illusory spare hours of already busy people. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” (This latter point becomes the focus of my later essay on A Mantra in Search of Meaning, also published as part of a symposium, this one at the University of North Carolina Law School celebrating the 40th anniversary of Baker v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Joseph FishkinMost writers and scholars (perhaps most people in general?) [read post]