Search for: "People v Novel"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,091
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2012, 6:22 am
Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 11:11 am
U.S. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 6:29 am
Woolsey’s decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
A good example is the Eagle v Morgan et al. case (for a commentary on the piece, see my recent blog post here). [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:10 am
Likewise, Aldous Huxley used Henry Ford's name as a deity-like reference in his 1931 novel Brave New World. [read post]
3 May 2023, 2:20 am
They were Baptists, and since moving to Oryol in 2005 they had regularly invited people to their home for prayer and Bible reading [1-5]. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Leon, Illinois v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:59 am
The New York Court of Appeals takes up that issue, holding that when identification is an issue in a criminal case and the identifying witness and defendant appear to be of different races, a party is entitled to a charge on the risks inherent in cross-racial identification.The case is People v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 11:35 am
Subheading that appears at the top of my browser but not on the page: "Woody Allen and Dylan Farrow v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:36 am
According to Jennifer Lowe, director of programs and strategic planning, Jones favored re-enactments for the “novel, new and different way” the experience “teaches people about Supreme Court cases. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 1:50 pm
Supreme Court opinion quotes from a 158 year-old novel. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:09 am
That was the contention of James Dunham, the lead plaintiff in Dunham v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
Virginia: A Documentary Novel of the Landmark Civil Rights Case. [read post]
19 May 2007, 9:18 pm
The whole deal in the CAFC opinion in KSR v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:20 am
This result was achieved by the introduction of a novel “threshold of seriousness” into the legal definition of what constitutes a “defamatory” imputation. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 2:48 am
As a followup on the interrelationship of KSR v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:50 am
We decline to subscribe to PragerU’s novel opt-in theory of the First Amendment. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 9:04 am
Our review of the novel issue presented in this case has been aided in significant part by the district courts that have previously considered it, and, in particular, by the Eastern District of California’s decision in Gallo, 430 F. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 11:39 am
Judge VanDyke has a point here.The question is whether the Cal Expo fairgrounds in Sacramento are a public forum sufficient to allow people to distribute First Amendment literature therein. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:02 am
In its decision in OPO v. [read post]
