Search for: "People v Roy R." Results 81 - 100 of 187
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
Hacked Off and Roy Greenslade have been demanding his resignation for some time. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:14 am by J. Bradley Smith, Esq.
“They read my messages with him I’m done,” Carter wrote to a friend shortly before her indictment, according to People Magazine. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgment in media law cases are outstanding: R (Evans) v HM Attorney-General, heard 24 and 25 November 2014 (UK Supreme Court) Rufus v Elliott, heard 10 December 2014 (McCombe and Sharp LJJ and Mitting J) OPO v MLA, heard 9 and 20 January 2015 (UK Supreme Court) Murray v Associated Newspapers, heard 21 January 2015 (Longmore, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd, heard 4… [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
Roy Greenslade covers his portrayal across the media here. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
  On 29 January 2015 the Court of Appeal (Moore-Bick and Tomlinson LJJ and Sir Robin Jacob) heard the appeal in the case of R (Ingenious Media) v HMRC. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 1:27 pm by Ken White
Arguably the closest comparison is to cases dealing with material-assistance-to-terrorist-organization prosecutions like U.S. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 1:27 pm by Ken White
Arguably the closest comparison is to cases dealing with material-assistance-to-terrorist-organization prosecutions like U.S. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
Yet, the NDA Government has not officially communicated to the people why it thought it fit to bring in these twin Ordinances. [read post]
11 May 2014, 7:42 pm by INFORRM
Michael Varey v People: The complaint was of harassment by a photographer commissioned via an agency. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:38 am by Florian Mueller
See this CNET article, "Apple's R&D up 32 percent in 2013, still dwarfed by rivals". [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 7:58 am
From the Louisiana Supreme Court decision in State v. [read post]