Search for: "People v. Barrett"
Results 81 - 100
of 898
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2022, 10:00 am
Roberts In the Dobbs v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:54 am
Despite this, the judges reflect very carefully on the outcomes for the people involved as well as the need to ensure the proper development of the law. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 5:00 am
In Biden v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 7:24 am
Thomas and Gorsuch dissent, Barrett and Alito concur. [read post]
7 Sep 2006, 11:42 am
Barrett et al. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
This provision bars certain people who "engaged in insurrection" from serving in certain federal and state positions. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 9:19 pm
(Remember Bush v. [read post]
28 Nov 2020, 5:46 am
Science, but God v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 11:16 pm
Barrett v LB Southwark [2008] EWHC 1568 (Comm) was an appeal of a dismissed application for permission to make a s.204 appeal out of time on an intentional homelessness decision upheld at s.202 review. [read post]
13 Nov 2021, 2:39 pm
Justice Barrett may have thought no. ] In John Does 1-3 v. [read post]
15 Jan 2022, 8:37 pm
The Biden v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
In dissent by himself, Justice Thomas did make originalist arguments but Justices Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett, and Alito did not join him.2021-2022:In Dobbs v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:30 am
Very few people remember, however, the Court's first reproductive rights case, Skinner v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 10:39 am
Last month, the Supreme Court issued a decision in Haaland v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 6:22 am
The justices announced late Friday that they will hear oral argument on Nov. 30 in Trump v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:07 am
Barrett's Jackson List: The courtroom was jammed. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
(BARRETT, J., concurring in part and concurring in the judgment). [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:21 am
And (for me) the issue of scandal is quite serious here: Others who see the orthodox Catholic judge affirming Roe v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 10:36 am
S. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 5:15 am
Doctor’s Data, Inc. v. [read post]
