Search for: "People v. Chambers (1998)"
Results 81 - 100
of 148
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm
American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 2:02 pm
She considers such cases as Hatton v United Kingdom, Lopez Ostra v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 9:20 am
As Trial Chamber I of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda explained in paragraph 505 of its judgment in Prosecutor v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
On 14 March 2012, Tugendhat J handed down judgment in Citation PLC v Ellis Whittam Ltd, ([2012] EWHC 549 (QB)) On 15 March 2012 Tugendhat J gave judgment in Weston v Bates ([2012] EWHC 590 (QB)) Events 19 March 2012, 6pm: The Data Protection Act 1998 and Personal Privacy, Philip Coppel QC, Organised by the Statute Law Society with the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:20 pm
” [Prosecutor v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:00 am
The only available guidance derives from DPP v Collins ([2006] UKHL 40), an appeal from the Divisional Court. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
The English courts can issue a declaration of incompatibility if any legislation is found to be incompatible with the Human Rights Act, 1998 (“HRA”). [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:28 pm
Cir. 1998). [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
" The Recorder Rimsky Yuen, SC in Chambers, Court of First Instance, High Court, agreed. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
The Constitution Bench of this Court in Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia and Others v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:51 am
The pleaded causes of action were libel, harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and breach of the Data Protection Act 1998. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:34 am
Ninety-eight prisoners were put to death in 1998, the busiest year for U.S. death chambers since executions resumed in 1977 following a halt imposed by the Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 8:12 am
S.H. and Others v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am
Comment This case is significant for two reasons: First, it tasks the Supreme Court with answering the question raised obiter by Lady Hale in Savage v South Essex NHS Trust [2009] 1 AC 653, namely “what is the extent of the state’s duty to protect all people against an immediate risk of self-harm? [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:05 pm
., v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:17 am
(See Downing v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 7:54 am
Measured in terms of money spent, the Chamber is by far the most powerful lobby in Washington, DC, spending $770.6 million since 1998, over three times the amount spent by General Electric, the second-largest spender. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm
The period addressed the dip between a new road opening and ‘people getting used to it’.The Court of Appeal held that:The general purpose of these provisions is, as the 1972 White Paper made clear, to strike a balance between public and private interests. [read post]
