Search for: "People v. Fields (1979)"
Results 81 - 100
of 155
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2015, 3:28 am
Erdely provided additional testimony on the overall nuances of Torrential Downpour and its role in the field of P2P file sharing. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am
See, e.g., People ex rel. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 8:24 pm
Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244 (2003); Grutter v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:07 am
The top of the product detail page will still display the customer’s initial inquiry “MTM Special Ops” in the search field. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 3:48 pm
(Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council )The United Nations Human Rights Council has a number of interests. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:54 am
Nola Spice Designs, LLC v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:39 am
Nearly every village has its own cricket field where the young men play and the old men watch. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 3:37 pm
The problem was based on United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:07 pm
Presently EPA and the state do not treat drainage districts as point sources, but instead consider them to be an exempt nonpoint source - carrying water running off farm fields after storms. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 8:47 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
In re J.N., Jr., 406 A.2d 1275, 1283 (D.C. 1979). [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 2:09 pm
Bradley, 440 U.S. 93, 97 (1979). [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
Given Selikoff’s reputation and prestige in the field of asbestos health effects, and his role in helping pass the Williams-Steiger Act of 1969, we might wonder why no one has written a full-length biography. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 8:19 pm
Appl Environ Microbiol 64:1975-1979. 10. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 1:08 am
Domestic rape cases in the late 18thand 19th centuries show that people did not even want to talk about rape in the context of the new prudery of the time. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 3:32 pm
To conclude that officers in the field must follow a plan which is set in place by the higher echelons, and then to conclude that the officers in the field may cavalierly disregard certain key elements of that plan, whether intentionally or unintentionally, would be to countenance the "standardless and unconstrained discretion" and "evil" the Supreme Court spoke about in the case of Delaware v Prouse,, 440 US 648, 661 [1979]. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:32 pm
Accordingly, his claims are not properly preserved for appellate review under CPL 470.05, subd. 2 and based on the ruling in People v Cadorette. [read post]
