Search for: "People v. Juvenile Court"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2013, 6:57 pm
For example, recent cases percolating through the appellate courts here in Michigan address whether SCOTUS' Miller decision should be applied retroactively.In People v Carp, for example, the Michigan Court of Appeals held that the SCOTUS' Eighth Amendment ruling did not apply retroactively. [read post]
5 May 2009, 10:31 am
The Supreme Court in 2005 outlawed the death penalty for juvenile criminals in the case Roper v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:17 pm
In People v. [read post]
29 May 2022, 12:26 pm
People v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 2:19 pm
State v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 8:01 am
’ (People v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 11:15 am
Steagald v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:00 am
The case is - The People of the State of Colorado, v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:45 am
” The Court has previously shown leniency to juveniles, holding in Roper v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:45 am
” The Court has previously shown leniency to juveniles, holding in Roper v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:45 am
” The Court has previously shown leniency to juveniles, holding in Roper v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 3:59 am
FlynnOral argument is scheduled in the Michigan Supreme Court for March 6th in the juvenile lifer case of People v Raymond Carp to determine whether the SCOTUS decisions banning state juvenile lifer laws should get retroactive application. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 3:26 pm
The law review article says: “Based on the goals of the juvenile system, significant advances in adolescent development research and recent Supreme Court holdings on juvenile culpability, we argue here that the juvenile code should be amended to explicitly refer to a reasonable child standard for any mens rea element that relies on a reasonable person as the measure for criminal culpability. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 1:43 am
And it ends: Perhaps juvenile justice advocates should not place their faith in federal courts. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 8:25 am
The Court has heard Graham v. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 2:35 pm
BREED v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 11:17 pm
Because it's the lowest form of juvenile humor, even though it was the only opinion published today by the California Court of Appeal, I promised myself I wasn't going to comment about the caption in this case.But then, on page four, I read this line by Justice Aaron: "Ralph saw Goodwillie put something down his pants. . . . [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:04 pm
case=6291421178853922648&q=miller+v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:04 pm
case=6291421178853922648&q=miller+v. [read post]
