Search for: "People v. Keys (1985)" Results 81 - 100 of 267
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2011, 2:19 pm by Juan Antunez
White, 463 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 1985), the 1985 Florida Supreme Court decision that has defined this area of the law in Florida ever since. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
The route to get there varies, although it will normally take in Awua, Pereira, Runa Begum, Din v Wandsworth, Monk, Kay (x2), Doherty, Quick v Taff Ely, Pye (x2), Uratemp, and so on. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
The route to get there varies, although it will normally take in Awua, Pereira, Runa Begum, Din v Wandsworth, Monk, Kay (x2), Doherty, Quick v Taff Ely, Pye (x2), Uratemp, and so on. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 7:54 am by Lovechilde
Chamber -- which represented the interests of the broader business community, and therefore key to creating a united front. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 5:00 am by Jed Rubenfeld
But in 1985, as I pointed out in my earlier piece, the Supreme Court in Skinner v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 1:27 pm by Giles Peaker
R (Jakimaviciute) v LB Hammersmith and Fulham [2013] EWHC 4372 (Admin) [Not generally available yet. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 1:27 pm by Giles Peaker
R (Jakimaviciute) v LB Hammersmith and Fulham [2013] EWHC 4372 (Admin) [Not generally available yet. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 12:55 am by David Smith
Potter v Dyer [2011] EWCA Civ 1417This is another rather sad and complex case with a fairly convoluted set of facts. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 12:55 am by David Smith
Potter v Dyer [2011] EWCA Civ 1417This is another rather sad and complex case with a fairly convoluted set of facts. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm by John Dean
  Norquist states that his pledge is self-enforcing—”candidates and incumbents solemnly bind themselves”—but in a leading case cited in the Standler essay (above), Schaefer v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 2:56 am by Florian Mueller
It can afford more easily than any other company in the world to get some people to say things that independent experts couldn't possibly say with a straight face. [read post]