Search for: "People v. King (1992)"
Results 81 - 100
of 148
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
In the 1992 case of New York v. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 1:48 pm
In People v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Background on the King v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 8:09 am
(Dickerson v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
King-Washington v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm
Such a motion is waived, however, if not made within five days of arraignment (see also, People v Jones, 187 AD2d 750 [3rd Dept 1992], lv den, 81 NY2d 790 [1993]), although in some cases, discussed below, that five-day deadline may be extended. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 5:33 am
S. 833, 850 (1992)). [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
The incarnation of the people of England (represented as was customary for the time by its classes―king, lords temporal and spiritual, and commons) would have viewed an unconstrained common law as constraining its ability to “make” law, that is to use the power of commanding behavior instrumentally. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 11:34 am
Manini, 79 NY2d 561, 569 (1992); People v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 2:22 pm
In McDonald v. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 8:37 pm
So, between 1971 and 1992, you’ve had many exchanges with Dr. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:16 am
Nationalist Movement, 505 U.S. 123, 134 (1992). [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:52 am
,quoting Lyons v Lyons, 187 AD2d 415, 416 [2d Dept 1992]). [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:52 am
,quoting Lyons v Lyons, 187 AD2d 415, 416 [2d Dept 1992]). [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 5:25 pm
Bundy, 186 A.D.2d 357, 588 N.Y.S.2d 167 (1st Dept., 1992); People v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:39 am
Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992) (federal)--Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:35 am
(Dickerson v. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 4:20 pm
The claimant also demonstrated that the dismissal of the indictment, at the request of the People, was based, in part, on newly-discovered medical evidence based on CPL 440.10 [1] [g]. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
I think that oftentimes people refer to infringement as theft in the colloquial sense of the word, but it’s the legal meaning of the term that I will focus on. [read post]
