Search for: "People v. Roberts (1981)"
Results 81 - 100
of 170
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:43 pm
” Prosecutor v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 3:00 pm
Here, it refers to its 1999 opinion in People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran v. [read post]
26 May 2014, 5:35 am
In Petrella v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 6:57 pm
This violation of private communications was revealed in news coverage in the Guardian and the Nation reporting on criminal attorney Robert Gottleib’s discovery that all his communications with his client, Adis Medunjanin, had been overheard and recorded by the National Security Agency. 2. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 4:32 am
Here’s how Chief Justice John Roberts put it in Gonzales v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
See Spartan Steel v Martin & Co [1973] 1 QB 27, 37; Lamb v Camden London Borough Council [1981] 1 QB 625, 634, 636–637. 2 See A. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
Uebler, Esquire, Robert L. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 12:57 pm
Vincent, 454 U.S. 263, 267-70 (1981); Healy , 408 U.S. at 187. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 9:40 pm
That criticism related to a statutory power under the Contempt of Court Act 1981 to restrict reporting and led to the creation of Chapter 102 of the existing Rules of The Court of Session. [read post]
1 May 2013, 9:22 am
Czech-American tennis great Martina Navratilova came out publicly as bisexual way back in 1981. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 2:14 pm
Supreme Court last week, Bailey v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 8:49 pm
” Wells v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:30 am
The Episcopal Church (No. 11-0265), may be watched here; the second, Robert Masterson, et al., v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 11:21 am
Meanwhile, others abuse the system to receive free money[v] that is administered by one of the most wasteful and ineffective bodies—the American government—which charges a massive administration fee. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:19 am
S. 175, 185 (1981); see also Bilski v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 9:06 pm
I'm thinking, for instance, of work on section 1981, like Robert J.Kaczorowski's "The Enforcement Provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1866: A Legislative History in Light of Runyon v. [read post]
