Search for: "People v. Rodgers"
Results 81 - 100
of 108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
Rodgers, 12-382, concerns the “clearly established” standard in Section 2254(d), asking whether Faretta v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
Because it's almost inevitable - rummage through enough documents and emails of enough people (a quarter million or so will do) and eventually you're very likely to discover somebody saying, or doing, or proposing something dumb. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:52 am
Mukasey, Diallo v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am
The ICO also published new guidance for all organisations considering using people’s biometric data. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 10:45 pm
It is unlikely, however, that judges can be relied upon to step up on this issue in light of the recent judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Schalk and Kopf v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:00 am
ECtHR 8 November 2005, Bader and others v Sweden, par. 47; ECtHR 22 June 2006, D. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am
In Winfield v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 5:10 am
Group 11 – Choice of Court and Arbitration V. [read post]
18 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
One is the cultural power of alternatives to the liberal tradition, most notably the civic republicanism emphasized by Gordon Wood and others.[3] Agrarian debt relief resonated strongly with several strands of the republican tradition: the virtue of the yeoman farmer, the necessity of an economically independent citizenry, the state’s capacious powers to provide for the people’s welfare.[4] Republican ideology both valorized farmers as particularly deserving citizens and… [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
But, under reference to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Karakó v Hungary (Application No 39311/05) (unreported), given 28 April 2009, he submitted that article 8 does not confer a right to have your reputation protected from being affected by what other people say. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 5:57 pm
” Clay v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 6:00 am
In Fields v. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 1:32 am
Unlike the primary focus of this Blog, it deals not with the appeals the court hears, but with the behaviour of the people at the heart of decision-making in the Court: the UKSC Justices. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 6:00 am
In Fields v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:25 pm
The novel was not a work of pure fiction, but included real people and information presented as “fact”. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:01 am
The case echoes the dispute involved in the 2008 Supreme Court decision in Medellin v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
This is elaborated a little more in the abstract: Pix credit hereABSTRACT: When the leaders of the United States and of the Peoples Republic of China refer to human rights, they invoke entirely different conceptions. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
: (Patent Circle), Tanzania to conduct study on impact of counterfeit medicines: (Afro-IP), US: New rules on generic biological medicines under US Congressional debate: (Intellectual Property Watch), Pharma & Biotech - Products Acular (Ketorolac) – US: CAFC rules against Apotex reverse doctrine of equivalents: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan, Inc v Apotex: (Patent Circle), Carbatrol (Carbamazapine) – US: Federal judge allows Corepharma to seek DJ that its… [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:19 pm
Cantwell and her House counterpart, Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA). [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm
As the Council of Europe authors found, “[t]he most ‘successful’ of problematic content is that which plays on people’s emotions, encouraging feelings of superiority, anger or fear. [read post]
