Search for: "People v. Williams (1979)" Results 81 - 100 of 171
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2016, 11:35 am by Mark Walsh
White to his fellow Justices in late April 1979 in a case about farm labor, to which White had been assigned the majority opinion. [read post]
2 May 2016, 1:11 pm
Williams, 362 N.C. 628, 669 S.E.2d 290, 294 (North Carolina Supreme Court 2008) (quoting In re Appeal of The Greens of Pine Glen Ltd. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:49 am by Nicholas B. Lewis
Passman, 442 U.S. 228, 230 (1979) (Fifth Amendment violation based on discrimination in public employment); Carlson v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:49 am by Nicholas B. Lewis
Passman, 442 U.S. 228, 230 (1979) (Fifth Amendment violation based on discrimination in public employment); Carlson v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:49 am by Nicholas B. Lewis
Passman, 442 U.S. 228, 230 (1979) (Fifth Amendment violation based on discrimination in public employment); Carlson v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  From the First Amendment side, we have Reed v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 7:00 am by GSU Law Student
Sources [1] Bikram’s Yoga Coll. of India, L.P. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 8:41 am by Bill Otis
Experts differ on the size of the effect, but I think that William Spelman and Steven Levitt have it right in believing that greater incarceration can explain one-quarter or more of the crime decline. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 10:19 am by Brian Shiffrin
” (People v Ciaccio, 47 NY2d 431, 439 [1979].)In People v Glover (195 AD2d 999 [4th Dept 1993]), the Court held that it was not improper for a police officer to describe what he had told the suspect prior to the suspect making a statement. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:22 pm by Gary P. Rodrigues
Rand by William KaplanA Trying Question: The Jury in Nineteenth Centre Canada by R. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]