Search for: "Perez v. Small" Results 81 - 100 of 148
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2014, 5:59 pm by Joy Waltemath
The court also found that, in promulgating the rule, the OFCCP was justified in not exempting construction contractors (Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Brasier, Detroit Free Press] Case against deference: “Now More Than Ever, Courts Should Police Administrative Agencies” [Ilya Shapiro on Perez v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 12:03 pm by Cody Poplin
Perez, and former White House Counsel Kathryn H. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 4:29 am by Amy Howe
” At Notice and Comment, the blog of the Yale Journal on Regulation, Jeff Pojanowski previews the regulatory case Perez v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 7:55 am by Joy Waltemath
Giving a male general manager a chance to put before a jury his claim that he was terminated based on lobbying by a female human resources employee whose romantic and sexual advances he had repeatedly rebuffed, the appeals court vacated in part the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the employer (Velazquez-Perez v Developers Diversified Realty Corp, May 23, 2014, Kayatta, W). [read post]
13 May 2014, 6:46 am by Joy Waltemath
In a dissent, Judge Shepherd disagreed with the majority’s determination that deference was due (Perez v Loren Cook Co, May 9, 2014, Melloy, M). [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 5:23 pm by Kim Krawiec
Related Posts: Taxing Eggs: A Mini-Symposium Taxing Eggs: Introduction to Perez v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, the In the Matter of: Perez v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:37 am by Joy Waltemath
A coalition of civil rights groups and the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) recently announced the filing of two amicus briefs in a high profile case, UPMC Braddock v Perez (No 13-5158), currently pending before the D.C. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 7:25 am by Joy Waltemath
Because the ALJ ignored the weight of scientific evidence and the full OSHA Review Commission declined to intervene, the appeals court granted the employer’s petition for review and vacated the citation (Caterpillar Logistics, Inc v Perez, December 12, 2013, Easterbrook, F). [read post]