Search for: "Perry v. Waters"
Results 81 - 100
of 151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Best v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am
water wars!) [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am
The resulting legislation, popularly known as the “Clean Water Act,” prohibits the discharge without a permit of any pollutant into “navigable waters,” defined to mean “the waters of the United States” (to nerds, “WOTUS”). [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
., have agreed to pay $49,000 to settle EPA claims that they violated federal Clean Water laws regulating preparedness for oil spills, under the terms of a settlement with EPA. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:46 am
Johns River Water Management District 11-1447Issue: (1) Whether a land-use agency can be held liable for a taking when it refused to issue a land-use permit on the sole basis that the permit applicant did not accede to a permit condition that, if applied, would violate the essential nexus and rough proportionality tests set out in Nollan v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
Summers v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 3:26 am
How does the water respond? [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for a four-justice plurality, concluded that only wetlands that have a continuous surface water connection to regulated waters may themselves be regulated under the act. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:19 am
§ 1369(b)(1)(F), the portion of the Clean Water Act’s judicial review provision that requires that agency actions “in issuing or denying any permit” under Section 1342 be reviewed by the court of appeals, to decide petitions to review the waters-of-the-United-States rule, even though the rule does not “issu[e] or den[y] any permit” but instead defines the waters that fall within Clean Water Act jurisdiction. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm
Johns River Water Management District 11-1447Issue: (1) Whether a land-use agency can be held liable for a taking when it refused to issue a land-use permit on the sole basis that the permit applicant did not accede to a permit condition that, if applied, would violate the essential nexus and rough proportionality tests set out in Nollan v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:31 pm
See, e.g., Perry v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 6:30 am
Tillerson emphasized the fact that Article V of the security treaty with Japan covers the disputed Senkaku Islands, alluded to strengthening trilateral cooperation between Japan, Korea and the United States, and restated of the defensive logic of THAAD. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
Click Here North Idaho Developers Fined Nearly $45K for Storm Water Violations. [read post]
26 May 2023, 11:37 am
[1] Perry Bonin, et al., v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm
The executive order, which is the first step in what is expected to be a very lengthy process to rewrite the rule, instructs EPA to rewrite the rule so that the definition of navigable waters is consistent with the standard set out by Justice Scalia in the 2006 case Rapanos v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 7:43 am
Rostker v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 9:11 pm
In United States v. [read post]
