Search for: "Person v. Commissioner of Correction"
Results 81 - 100
of 847
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
”[3] These two strands—the refusal to settle with persons who deny the allegations and the belief that refusing to admit is a denial—converge in the requirement that to settle with the Commission, a person must either (1) admit the allegations underlying the Commission’s enforcement action or (2) state that she neither admits nor denies the allegations. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 12:54 pm
Commissioner of the Indiana Dept. of Corrections (No. 10-3339) granted summary judgment to IDOC, and the Seventh Circuit affirmed. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 7:50 am
”Ultimately many of the technical defects in Eskridge's appeal were cured consistent with the advisory given to Eskridge by the Commissioner’s Office of Counsel that “if the corrected version was served and filed within two weeks of July 3, 2012, the appeal would be deemed to have been initiated on the day a copy of the returned petition was personally served upon respondents. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
CASEY, Administrative Law Judge Petitioner, the Department of Correction, brought this disciplinary proceeding against respondent, Correction Officer Andre Anderson, under section 75 of the Civil Service Law. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
CASEY, Administrative Law Judge Petitioner, the Department of Correction, brought this disciplinary proceeding against respondent, Correction Officer Andre Anderson, under section 75 of the Civil Service Law. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
My remarks today reflect my individual views as a Commissioner of the SEC and do not necessarily reflect the views of the full Commission or my fellow Commissioners. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 5:03 am
Duffy v Kent County Levy County, 591 Fed. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
Commissioner (7th Cir. 2012). [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm
The Court of Appeal decision in Google Inc v Vidal-Hall [2015] EWCA Civ 311(27 March 2015) (Dyson MR and Sharp LJ in a joint judgment; McFarlane LJ concurring), affirming the judgment of Tugendhat J (at[2014] EWHC 13 (QB) (16 January 2014)), is a very important decision on damages for invasion of privacy, and it raises significant questions about the correctness of Feeney J’s reasoning in the earlier Irish case of Collins v FBD Insurance plc [2013] IEHC 137 (14 March… [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 10:29 am
Simply because the Commissioner advanced an argument that we reject, but then argued that if we reject it, we should apply the rule that we held applicable in our opinion is hardly a reason for abandoning the rule that we believed to be correct. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Capozzo v. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 4:33 am
He will complete his submission on day two and the court will also hear oral submission from the Information Commissioner’s Office (“ICO”), one of the interveners. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am
” They are correct. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 8:50 am
Michigan’s insurance commissioner needs to act Using your regulatory powers, Mr. [read post]
9 May 2023, 4:51 pm
Search engines The ICO has, since Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja Gonzalez (Case C-131/12) (‘Google Spain’) considered claims from data subjects about the lawfulness of the processing of their personal data by search engines. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 9:42 am
Recently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, in Minarsky v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 1:00 am
In Commissioners for Special Purposes of the Income Tax v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 8:35 pm
The IPC employed the 2-part test provided by the Supreme Court of Canada in Canada (Information Commissioner) v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 2:26 am
This appeal will consider whether the Respondents were “workers” providing personal service and if they were “workers”, what periods constituted their “working time”. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:02 am
The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human rights yesterday heard the conjoined applications in Von Hannover v Germany and Springer v Germany. [read post]
