Search for: "Peters et al v. T " Results 81 - 100 of 391
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2022, 12:08 am
Déposé dans les délais (art. 50 PA) et les formes requises (art. 52 PA) par la destinataire de la décision litigieuse, laquelle possède un intérêt digne de protection à son annulation ou à sa modification (art. 48 al. 1 PA), le recours est donc recevable sur le plan formel et il peut être entré en matière sur ses mérites. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 4:03 am by Charles Sartain
Peters, et al. reminds us of the directive imposed by Oklahoma’s constructive notice doctrine:  Read and understand documents that you sign affecting your land. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 3:05 pm by Steve Wells
The case is District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District, et al. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
Wilhem von Leeb et al., Judgment, XI Trials of War Criminals before the Nuernberg Military Tribunals 690-95, while Schlegelberger's is in the better-known Justice Case.)This may sound like ancient history, but it seems significant that in the past the U.S. threw the book at government lawyers for conduct that is awfully close to the allegations in this lawsuit.3. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 1:41 pm by Ellena Erskine
FPC American Victory Fund, et al., the Second Amendment Foundation, et al., and the NRA Civil Rights Defense Fund provide interpretations of the amendment’s language. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm by Mark Litwak
However, "[t]he question of substantial similarity is by no means exclusively reserved for resolution by a jury . . . in certain circumstances, it is entirely appropriate for a district court to resolve that question as a matter of law, `either because the similarity between two works concerns only non-copyrightable elements of the plaintiff's work, or because no reasonable jury, properly instructed, could find that the two works are substantially similar.'"[3]… [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 9:36 pm
In re Peter Joseph Giacomini et al (CAFC 2009-1400) precedential The Tran patent's filing date is December 29, 2000, exactly a month after Giacomini filed his applica-tion. [read post]
19 Apr 2014, 4:01 am by Steven Gursten
Stoddard, et al.) are once again decided on the basis of an accurate interpretation of Michigan law. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:04 am by Cody M. Poplin
Jackson wrote in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:08 pm by Marie Louise
Lenovo International, et. al. / No, DED Brigham and Women’s Hospital Inc. et al v. [read post]