Search for: "Pfizer Inc. v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 252
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2022, 9:16 am
On Tuesday 22nd February, the Supreme Court will hear the case of Competition and Markets Authority v Pfizer Inc and Flynn Pharma Ltd, on appeal from [2020] EWCA 617. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 4:14 am
(b) Any person may sue for the penalty, in which event one-half shall go to the person suing and the other to the use of the United States. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 11:58 am
” United States ex rel. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 12:55 am
Pharmacia Corp., et al., Nos. 07-4500 and 07-4564 (January 30, 2009).The securities class action against Pharmacia Corporation ("Pharmacia"), Pfizer, Inc. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
Pfizer, Inc., 712 F.3d 21 (1st Cir. 2013), Aetna, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 11:55 am
Connex-Metalna Management Consulting GmbH, 302 F.3d 358, 365 (5th Cir. 2002) (quoting United Parcel Service, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:39 am
Pfizer, Inc., 835 F. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 11:14 pm
Pfizer, Inc., 361 F.3d 1016, 1020 (7th Cir.2004). [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:10 am
Pfizer Inc. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
Pfizer, Inc., 490 F. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:30 pm
’” Pfizer Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
Pfizer, Inc., 2008 WL 2468538 (N.Y. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 3:11 pm
Pfizer Pharms., Inc., 2011 WL 7659333, at *6-10 (S.D. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 7:44 pm
Pfizer, Inc., 439 F.3d 1358, 1362-63 (Fed. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 7:54 am
Intel Corp., Eli Lilly & Co., Johnson & Johnson, and Pfizer Inc. were among the companies that supported Roche. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:47 am
Pfizer, Inc., appears at 2011-1 Trade Cases ¶77,455. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
Pfizer, Inc., 153 S.W.3d 758, 766 (Ky. 2004) (DTC exception “recognized only by New Jersey”); Mendez Montes De Oca v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 8:42 pm
Klein Tools, Inc., 949 F.2d 1047, 1048 (8th Cir. 1991) and Pfizer Inc. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:30 am
Pfizer, Inc., 381 F. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 7:43 pm
United States v. [read post]