Search for: "Poole v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,942
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2013, 11:36 am
Starbucks Corporation, No. 10–4912–cv, and Winans et al. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 4:10 am
” United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:24 pm
Aviva Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:11 am
” In light of this significant change, it is highly encouraged that employers – especially those in the Ninth Circuit – seek legal counsel and review their tip pooling arrangements carefully to ensure compliance with the current state of the law. [1] Montano v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:59 am
Weideman Today the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Lu v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 1:59 pm
In Dickerson v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 5:09 pm
Therefore, employers complying with state law minimum wages will not have to worry about the FLSA when constructing tip pools.The case is Cumbie v. [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 5:45 am
The case is entitled Matamoros et al v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 5:42 pm
Georgia Insurers Insolvency Pool v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 12:27 pm
Cooperativa v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 6:31 am
United States; and Coolidge v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 6:45 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 2:43 am
Baker v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 6:31 am
” Although the case appears to be a clear victory for employers in the State of California, employers still need to be cautious when enforcing their tip pooling policies and practices. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 5:09 am
Lu v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 11:11 am
" http://www.kentucky.com/news/state/v-print/story/832118.html Bahe Cook Cantley and Jones personal injury lawyer Larry Jones said that the news is devastating, especially since so many pool deaths are preventable. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:13 pm
Part I – Fighting About the Forum: State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 5:23 am
(And in some states, like California, they cannot do so without running afoul of state minimum wage laws.) [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
United States and McDonnell v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 12:17 pm
United States, No. 06-9977. [read post]
