Search for: "Price v. State ex rel. Price"
Results 81 - 100
of 367
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2012, 6:57 pm
The Blog of Legal Times recently featured an interesting case where a District Court Judge refused after the trial of a False Claims Act ("FCA") case to impose the minimum $50.2 million Civil False Claims Act penalty on the grounds that the penalty was unconstitutionally excessive in violation of the 8th Amendment: United States ex rel Kurt Bunk & Daniel Heuser v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 10:19 am
California ex rel. [read post]
31 May 2022, 8:29 am
On May 20, Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) filed an amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to grant certiorari in regards to a False Claims Act (FCA) decision in United States ex rel. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 9:53 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 3:19 pm
In West Virginia ex rel. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 9:48 am
Joining the Fourth Circuit, West Virginia ex rel. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 5:30 am
The Court thoroughly examined State of Louisiana, ex rel. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 5:18 pm
In U.S. ex rel. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:36 am
Coscia would then `repeat[ ] his strategy in the opposite direction,’ reselling the low-price contracts he purchased at a high price, or buying back the high-price contracts he sold at a low price. [read post]
31 May 2010, 8:23 am
Duxbury v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 10:54 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 1:47 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 7:26 am
U.S. ex rel. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:30 pm
Circuit ruled in U.S. ex rel Schweizer v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 2:39 pm
The High Court has agreed to review U.S. ex rel. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 3:28 pm
In U.S. ex rel. [read post]
3 May 2019, 5:55 am
State ex. rel. [read post]
19 May 2019, 2:31 pm
The case is captioned United States ex rel. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 12:07 pm
Harris v. [read post]