Search for: "Public Serv. Corp. v. Public Serv. Comm." Results 81 - 100 of 207
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am by Paul Bland
[Disclosure: Deepak Gupta of Public Citizen Litigation Group, which hosts this blog, is counsel of record for the respondents in Concepcion. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 8:05 pm
Indeed, any such interpretation would be far too vague to provide proper notice to the public. [read post]
  The last two steps require the court to determine whether the regulation directly advances the “substantial government interest asserted and is no more extensive than necessary to serve that interest. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 12:42 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2006); Sandt, 264 F.3d at1350–51; Finnigan Corp. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:12 am by Eric Goldman
In response to an email inquiry from a non-sponsor seeking clarification of the rules regarding whether it would be permissible for her to “discuss the Olympics…on social media,” the USOC informed her: [U]nless a company or organization’s primary business is disseminating news and information, the company’s social media platforms (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, SnapChat, Instagram, etc.) are commercial in nature, serving to promote the company or brand; to raise the… [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 2:03 pm
Of Unsecured Creditors of Buckhead America Corp. v. [read post]