Search for: "Public Utility Workers v. Public Service Co."
Results 81 - 100
of 161
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2020, 12:36 pm
Ayotte v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:07 pm
The Supreme Court’s recent King v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:15 pm
Plaintiff sued under Title VII, alleging that her white co-worker created a racially hostile work environment. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
Claiborne Hardware Co. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 1:55 pm
INS, 667 F.2d 771 (1981); Lauvik v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 2:36 pm
Atlantic Steel v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:03 pm
GM Co. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
Because Puerto Rico’s public utilities are categorically excluded from restructuring debt under Chapter 9 of the federal Bankruptcy Code (although the fifty states’ public utilities are not), the Commonwealth enacted the Recovery Act, which, among other things, “creates a mechanism for Puerto Rico’s public corporations to restructure their debt so that they can continue to provide essential public services… [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Raich v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
At issue was whether Title II and section 504 extended to newly built and altered public sidewalks. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:56 pm
That service is Legislation.gov.uk, launched in July 2010, which has now replaced the SLD and OPSI legislation services. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
Co., 676 F.3d at 1096. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:45 pm
Liberty Apparel Co. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
The Department of Transportation’s Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) is soliciting public comment on a proposed revision of its current hours-of-service (HOS) regulations, which limit the operating hours of commercial truck drivers. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 11:24 am
See Public Health Service (PHS) Act §2707(b). [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
., Petitioner, v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:15 am
PennsylvaniaDocket: 09-1396Issue(s): Whether a child's statements in an interview with a child protection agency worker investigating suspicions of past abuse are “testimonial” evidence subject to the demands of the Confrontation Clause under Crawford v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:06 am
To further explain our common sense understanding of why PSRs make sales, we find the paradigm “outside salesman” case Jewel Tea Co. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm
Bank v. [read post]
