Search for: "ROBERTS v. HOPE" Results 81 - 100 of 2,724
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2010, 6:10 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
From a letter BY Robert Merges TO the CAFC on 28 April 2010:At the request of TiVo’s counsel, I am writing to offer some additional information related to the amicus filing I submitted on Monday in TiVo v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 11:05 am
Judge Tallman finds -- in a quite well-written opinion -- that there's a qualitative difference between (1) forthrightly admitting to the police that you have cocaine in a closed container, which suffices to waive your Fourth Amendment privacy expectations, and (2) using secret code words in a jailhouse telephone call that you know is monitored in the hope that your confederate can dispose of some evidence, which does not.But Judge Tallman then concludes the opinion by hinting to the… [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 8:18 am by Frank Bowman
In the end, I doubt that Democrats have much to hope for from Roberts, or that Republicans have much to fear. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 12:20 pm by Kedar
Unfortunately, I haven’t been able to plow through the latter yet, but I hope to get through it by the end of the day. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:46 am by Michael C. Dorf
Part IV of the opinion for the Court by CJ Roberts in Trump v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 7:43 am by Robbie Kenney
Robert Singer introduces a resolution urging Congress to call for an Article V Convention of States. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:07 pm by Holly Doremus
If you doubt that, re-read Justice Scalia’s opinion, joined by Roberts, Alito, and Thomas, in Rapanos v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am by JB
Here are the questions I've put together for teaching The Health Care Cases, NFIB v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:03 pm by Josh Blackman
Roberts explains that Secretary Duke was "bound by the Attorney General's legal determination" concerning Texas v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 7:44 am
Here is the abstract: Embedded deep in the constitutional imagination is the notion that courts can implement rights and effectuate the hope of Marbury v. [read post]