Search for: "Rhodes v. Paul "
Results 81 - 100
of 117
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2009, 8:10 am
A Rhodes Scholar, Souter was a serious thinker, a prodigious reader, a hard worker, and a scrupulously careful lawyer. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm
Although no rule or statute prohibits side switching, state and federal courts have exercised what they have called an inherent power to supervise and control ethical breaches by lawyers and expert witnesses.[1] The Wang Test Although certainly not the first case on side-switching, the decision of a federal trial court, in Wang Laboratories, Inc. v Toshiba Corp., has become a key precedent on disqualification of expert witnesses.[2] The test spelled out in the Wang case has generally been… [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:45 am
In a Nov. 1 letter, the senators called on the SEC not to take action on either draft rule and instead allow shareholders to continue filing proxy access resolutions based on the 2006 AFSCME v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 3:51 am
., v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
In Hantz Financial Services, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am
Rhodes, editor.New York, N.Y. : Nova Science Publishers, c2010. [read post]
26 May 2016, 12:25 pm
On April 25, retired Justice John Paul Stevens reminisced about his late colleague Justice Antonin Scalia at Washington University in St. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 5:00 am
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 2.0) 1. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
Since 1663, the Royal Society has sported the motto: “Nullius in verba,” on no one’s authority. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 7:24 pm
In 1969, Timothy Leary challenged his arrest for possession of marijuana under the Act; the case of Leary v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 4:19 am
Paul Kirby reports for BBC News. [read post]
23 May 2022, 4:00 am
” Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Guest Blogger This post was prepared for a roundtable on Reforming the Supreme Court of the United States, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:44 pm
., 1980)“In Furman v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
The spectacle of, say, Justice John Paul Stevens (whom I much admired) serving for 34 years until he retired at the age of 90, is unknown not only abroad, but even more to the point, everywhere else in the United States (save, perhaps, Rhode Island). [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:52 pm
Supreme Court in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
For the Symposium on Jack M. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:12 am
” Kagan also paid her respects to the late Justice John Paul Stevens, who had passed away two days earlier. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable onCan this Constitution be Saved? [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
