Search for: "Ritter v State" Results 81 - 100 of 136
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The court stated that it did not need to decide whether liability existed under the prong 1 claim to dispose of the motion to dismiss, but noted that a report prepared by external counsel indicated that the company had a “woefully inadequate compliance system. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 5:00 am by John Jascob
Second, with respect to the Caremark claim, the more recent exposition of Caremark in Stone v. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am by Schachtman
The common law, as it developed in the United States from the early 19th century, was hospitable to apportionments that avoided “entire” or “joint and several” liability. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Lyonette Louis-Jacques
And only once did I imagine the parties in a case and give them faces – State v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 7:33 am
Trust as reliance and faith in character, and the expectations that this produced, were deeply embedded in the law of corporations as it developed in the United States (one notes, however, a generalized convergence of notions of director duties in European and Chinese systems; e.g., Gerner-Beuerle & Schuster, 2014, 199 (Europe); Xu et al. [read post]