Search for: "Rivas v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
* Oracle v Google: are certain elements of the Java platform entitled to copyright protection? [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 9:40 pm by CAPTAIN
Tomorrow, Group 62: Gordo v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 7:23 pm by John Floyd
  Qualified Immunity   In 1989, the United States Supreme Court in Graham v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Texas, 809 F.3d 134, 148 (5th Cir. 2015). 6 Kopan, Tal, Justice Department: Use 'illegal aliens,' not 'undocumented', CNN, (Jul. 24, 2018, 8:12 PM), https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/24/politics/justice–department–illegal–aliens–undocumented/index.html(last visited Oct. 23, 2021). 7See Alejandro Portes & Alejandro Rivas, The Adaptation of Migrant Children, Future Child., Spring 2011, at 219, 221–22. 8United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
However, denial of one petition is reversed where the state court's lack of notification and petitioner's prompt filing after receiving a response to his inquiry to the state court justified tolling. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
State of Tennessee, No. 06-6208 In civil rights suit alleging that city police discriminated against plaintiffs in violation of the Ame [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 8:08 am by Dan Bressler
” “‘Within days’ of the Sept. 19, 2019, receipt of the fourth letter, Houston and Rivas ran it by Reed Smith’s in-house counsel and the California State Bar’s ethics hotline, the panel said. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:55 pm by Jeff Kern and Kate Ross*
The annual report states that under Clayton, pursuit of individuals will be the rule rather than the exception.[12] One justification for this strategy is deterrence. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:23 pm by Jeff Kern and Kate Ross*
The annual report states that under Clayton, pursuit of individuals will be the rule rather than the exception.[12] One justification for this strategy is deterrence. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (IPBiz), US: Proposals for the approval of generic biologics under consideration: (Pharmacapsules@Gowlings), US: A paradigm shift in obviousness for pharma, biotech: (IP Law360), US: USPTO’s Bruce Kisliuk addresses ACI Pharma/biotech patent claim drafting and prosecution conference: (Patent Docs), US: New bill to provide biotech companies Sarbanes-Oxley relief: (California Biotech Law Blog), US: Biotech and pharma companies spent millions on lobbying in 2007: (Patent… [read post]