Search for: "Rodgers v. Herring" Results 81 - 100 of 173
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
  He said that he was attacked by “three men” and that he also “got a glance of this girl with a kind of a light on her face,” perhaps “a flashlight or a candle”; he also saw the “top” of the girl’s boots that he thought were “brown” and described “a floppy hat” worn by the girl with “long, stringy, blond hair. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
  The daughter was at her grandmother’s, but Lewis allowed Rodgers to stay overnight to sleep things off. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
Co., 813 F.2d 917, 919-921 (9th Cir. 1987)(complaint constructively filed upon delivery to clerk despite rejection for non-compliance with local rules and filing fee statute); Rodgers v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:07 pm by Rosalind English
The Secretary of State only withdrew her decision to exclude him from the UK when she was granted permission to make a control order against him, which was later modified to prevent him from contacting extremist affiliates in London by moving him to an address in the Midlands. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 5:41 am by Robert L Abell
Denise Maxey hired lawyer Rodger Lofton to represent her in a personal injury and accident case on a contingent fee basis. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 9:10 pm
In firmly dissenting, Judge Rodgers relies on her following analysis of the relevant caselaw:  "'Stops premised on a mistake of law, even a reasonable, good-faith mistake, are generally held to be unconstitutional.' United States v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 11:57 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Thereafter, Kathryn and her parents, Wanda and Rodger were named insureds in a Farmers policy. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 7:14 pm by INFORRM
Lord Rodger thought otherwise: ‘Doubtless, some may indeed draw the unjustified inference that M fears. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 9:19 am
Rodgers, 2001 BCCA 432, 90 B.C.L.R. (3d) 69, leave to appeal to ref'd [2001] S.C.C.A. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am by Adam Wagner
Lords Phillips and Brown (with whom Lord Rodger agrees) dissent and hold that because the appellants would have been lawfully detained the Secretary of State is not liable to them in false imprisonment: [319]-[334], [343]-[360]. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 1:47 pm by Wessen Jazrawi
He admits that he had expected Baroness Hale to be the most dissentient judge based on her dissents in a number of high profile cases, and in particular on the manner of her dissents. [read post]