Search for: "Rodgers v. Howes" Results 81 - 100 of 184
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2021, 2:53 am by Graham Green and Jonathan Lord
Rodgers v Leeds Laser Cutting Limited ET/1803829/2020 Case Facts This case considered the availability and legitimacy of fears over exposure to/contracting COVID-19 at work acting as grounds for statutory protection against unfair dismissal. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
  His manner offended his father-in-law, Freddy Kassab; how, Freddy thought, could MacDonald “go on television and almost say nothing about his family and what was done to them[?] [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 10:39 pm by Samuel Bray
[A major dissenting opinion by Judge Stras] The Eighth Circuit has just published its decision in Rodgers v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:07 pm by Rosalind English
However – particularly in the absence of any media arguments to the contrary – Lord Rodgers was at pains to emphasise that the judgment should not be regarded as laying down any general rule as to the way that applications for anonymity orders should be determined in control order cases. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 6:09 pm
If Peter had tried to go back on his assurance, the court could look back from that moment and decide if an equity had arisen and how best to satisfy it. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:10 am by Matthew Hill
It noted that the problem of deciding the Court’s temporal jurisdiction had been considered with varying results in previous cases, notably Blecic v Croatia (2006) 43 E.H.R.R. 48, Moldovan v Romania (2007) 44 E.H.R.R. 16, Balasoiu v Romania (App. no. 37424/97), 2 September 2003, and Kholodova v Russia (App. no. 30651/05), 14 September 2006. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:47 pm by Matthew Hill
But there is little explanation in the evidence of how significant that sensitivity may be. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
He shares how his team works hard to get the … Canadian Class Actions MonitorIndemnity Clause in Franchise Agreement Allows Class Action Defendant to Enforce Costs Award Against Representative Plaintiff’s Sole Shareholder The recent decision in Pet Valu Canada Inc v Rodger, 2018 ONSC 3353 (“Pet Valu”) is a good reminder of the importance of well-drafted and robust indemnity clauses for legal costs. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 7:14 pm by INFORRM
Lord Rodger thought otherwise: ‘Doubtless, some may indeed draw the unjustified inference that M fears. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 1:56 pm by J
Certainly that is how Martin Rodger QC, the Deputy President of the UT, approached matters. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 1:56 pm by J
Certainly that is how Martin Rodger QC, the Deputy President of the UT, approached matters. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:20 pm by Adam Wagner
Prisoners (as in Keenan v United Kingdom (2001) 33 EHRR 913),conscripts (Álvarez Ramón v Spain (application no 51192/99) 3 July 2001) and mental patients (Herczegfalvy v Austria (1992) 15 EHRR 437) are in a different position because the deprivation of liberty imparts more responsibility on the authorities concerned to ensure that any consequent suicidal ideation is properly dealt with. [read post]