Search for: "Rothman v. Rothman"
Results 81 - 100
of 246
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2018, 8:27 am
Sarver v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 4:30 am
In 1905 the Supreme Court of Georgia agreed in Pavesich v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 7:12 am
Keegan v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 5:00 am
(For greater detail, see Jennifer Rothman’s Roadmap to the Right of Publicity.) [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 2:11 pm
(See Rothman v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 11:29 am
’’ Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 2:33 pm
Rothman, John B. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 9:03 am
Rothman discussed issues like transferability, postmortem rights/justifications thereof; Prof. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 4:11 pm
In the case of Oueik v Foley [2017] NSWSC 1324 Rothman J dismissed a libel claim by a former political candidate against his opponent. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 6:43 am
In Karlo v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 3:27 pm
Conversely, the Court in Campbell v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 3:27 pm
Conversely, the Court in Campbell v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 9:10 am
Jennifer Rothman: TMs are part of this; also, cross subsidization of smaller films both by studios and by directors/etc. other people who fund what they want to do w/the bigger films.A: yes on TMs; maybe he needs a better term than adaptation. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 9:38 am
Wheaton v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:43 am
Don’t want to let TM Ps tell us what they want.Jennifer Rothman: Instead of unitary tests, we need lots of different tests? [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 11:17 am
Swann v. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 10:21 am
Litigation-related research has been the punching bag of self-appointed public health advocates for some time. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 4:09 am
She pleaded that the article meant that she was “not a fit and proper person to be a councillor”, which Justice Rothman held ([2017] NSWSC 555) was carried by the article and was defamatory of her. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 4:05 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Al Muderis v Duncan (No.3) [2017 NSWSC 726, Rothman J assessed damages in the sum of Aus $480,000 to a surgeon against a former patient and another individual who had engaged in a campaign of vilification against him. [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 9:32 am
Carl v. [read post]