Search for: "S. H. V. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 5,104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2024, 3:58 pm
The Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Groff v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
Colorado’s stated objectives are, instead, entirely about (in then-Judge Gorsuch’s words) the preservation of the integrity and “practical functioning” of the Colorado primary election process. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:12 am
United States. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 11:29 am
Recall that in 2018, in Pereira v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:21 am
Bollinger (2003)(overruled in the Harvard and UNC case):[H]igh-ranking retired officers and civilian leaders of the United States military assert that, “[b]ased on [their] decades of experience,” a “highly qualified, racially diverse officer corps … is essential to the military’s ability to fulfill its principle mission to provide national security. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
Scalia, J., thought Presidents were "officers of the United States" (Lawfare). [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
Cir. 2012) (quoting United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 9:03 am
R.4(h) provides the additional guidance that a company can be served “at a place not within any judicial district of the United States, in any manner prescribed by Rule 4(f) for serving an individual, except personal delivery under (f)(2)(C)(i). [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 3:30 am
More than a decade ago, a court aptly explained the problematic perceptions that flow from the Commission’s practice of settling without admissions and prohibiting denials: [H]ere an agency of the United States is saying, in effect, “Although we claim that these defendants have done terrible things, they refuse to admit it and we do not propose to prove it, but will simply resort to gagging their right to deny it. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:07 am
In particular, the Court deferred to the BIA’s narrow interpretation of INA §203(h)(3), 8 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
”[24] The court continued by observing that: [H]ere, the Provision is used by an agency of the federal government to shield itself from public view. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 3:42 pm
United States, a 5-4 decision from 2012 in which the Court concluded that many state actions to enforce federal immigration laws are preempted. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 1:43 pm
United States, 947 F.3d 1159, 1175 (9th Cir. 2020). [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 3:45 am
The B & H law firm commenced two separate actions on the plaintiff’s behalf against alleged owners of the loading dock. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:17 pm
H Limited. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am
At minimum, the implementation of all provisional measures should be a condition before the United States, or any country, considers further military or diplomatic support of Israel. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 2:51 pm
Most recently, in United Talent Agency, LLC v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 8:49 am
USCIS regulations state that employers are required to file an H-1B amendment on an employee’s behalf if any “material change” occurs to the employee’s current authorized employment. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 6:13 am
’ United States v. [read post]
