Search for: "SELLERS v. STATE" Results 81 - 100 of 3,986
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2023, 8:10 am by A. Hunter Faulkner, Esq.
They further stated that sellers should not be required to pay a buyer’s agent commission because a buyer’s agent is not performing services on behalf of a seller. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 9:17 am by Eric Goldman
Furthermore, at least three California state appellate court cases–the Bolger, Loomis, and Lee cases–have held that Amazon is the “seller” of everything on its site, including marketplace items. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:30 am by Sherica Celine
He also defends companies in state consumer protection investigations and data breach responses. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:24 am by centerforartlaw
Pest Control will authenticate a Banksy already owned or will work with buyers and sellers to authenticate an item that is in the process of being sold.[30] As is Banksy’s way, the authentication is done in rather clever ways. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 10:27 am by Jason Rantanen
  We have been told by many that the $2.2 billion Intel v. [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 9:26 am by Mavrick Law Firm
  Concerning this often raised defense, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in Woods v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 11:41 am by Kevin LaCroix
Insurers would be required to pay Appian $500 million if the state supreme court rules that Pegasystems should have won. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 11:11 am by Patricia Salkin
  Discovery Builders, Inc. v City of Oakland, 2023 WL 4115074 (CA App. 6/22/2023). [read post]