Search for: "SMITH v. CALIFORNIA" Results 81 - 100 of 2,244
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2007, 2:43 am
PROBATION CAN'T HAVE RIGID POLICIES WHICH AREN'T PARTICULAR TO A SPECIFIC DEFENDANT'S SITUATION (People v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:10 am by Ted Frank
As Professor Burch points out in her post, the pending Smith v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 2:11 pm
Similarly, while the narrow holding was that the law at issue was unconstitutional because it allowed some nonconsensual recordings -- particularly, body-worn cameras by police officers -- but not others, most state laws contain the same exceptions.So for states -- including California -- with two-party consent statutes, if the opinion stands, I doubt that most of them would survive. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:39 am by admin
State of California (1992) 4 Cal.4th 668, 680-681; see also California Teachers Assn. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 8:18 pm by Patent Docs
And while the various CRISPR interferences between The Broad Institute and the University of California (Nos. 105,048 and 105,115) and those parties and ToolGen (Nos. 106,126 and 106,127) and Sigma-Aldrich (Nos. 106,132 and 106,133) have... [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 9:42 am
Smith Jr. for this dissental (dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc) in Lane v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 11:01 am
 Judge Milan Smith, by contrast, not only dissents, but also helps to author the California Attorney General's petition for certiorari. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: In the 1987 decision, McCleskey v. [read post]