Search for: "SMITH v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,281
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2024, 4:30 am
While Justice Gorsuch situates the Court’s protection of website designer Lorie Smith against compelled speech—and orthodoxy—in the commercial marketplace as the latest in a series of courageous First Amendment decisions by the Court protecting individuals against an encroaching state, Justice Sotomayor’s dissent excoriates the majority for departing from the long history of the Court courageously defending citizenship-expanding… [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:18 pm
(Michael Smith previewed the case yesterday for this blog.) [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 4:15 am
Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter & Paul Home v Pennsylvania...; Burwell v Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc....), those cases were not decided under the First Amendment, but under the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993....The petitioners rely on language from Justice Gorsuch's concurrence in Masterpiece Cakeshop, joined by Justice Alito, which characterized the Smith rule as "controversial in many quarters".... [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:18 am
Priscilla Smith(Priscilla Smith represented Dr. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 3:00 pm
The idea is to bat away the Department of Justice’s apparent bid to have the appeal knocked out on jurisdictional grounds. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:05 am
In Smith v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:23 pm
The question that the court agreed on Friday to decide in Smith v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 9:24 am
Or of course the society could host a series just on Jackson the Supreme Court justice, a dissenter from the infamous Korematsu v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 7:15 am
The Supreme Court will have a rare afternoon argument next week on the first Monday in October, when the justices return to the bench after lunch to hear argument in Peter v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
To get a sense as to how the Justices might rule in Janus v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:26 am
Smith, The Historical and Constitutional Contexts of Jury Reform, 25 Hofstra L. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:47 pm
Both cases involve the process of inter partes review added to the Patent Act in 2012 as part of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 am
The Department of Justice relied “on a test set out by the” U.S. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:00 am
Rogers (2011) – Kelly TerryPublic Housing as Housing of Last Resort: Department of Housing and Urban Development v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 11:34 am
U.S. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 3:04 pm
By Daniel RichardsonZorn v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:43 am
Livestock Marketing (2005) -- assessments for government speech Smith v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 8:16 am
For one, the justices could jettison the flawed framework established in Employment Division v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:31 pm
Lawsuit for libel brought against public official turns on whether the statements objected to were uttered with “actual malice”Shulman v Hunderfund, 12 NY3d 143In the words of Justice Smith, “In this action for libel by a public figure, the record does not clearly and convincingly show that the statements in question were made with "actual malice," as required by New York Times Co. v Sullivan (376 US 254 [1964]). [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:13 am
The grant of leave comes on the heels of a Second Department decision in People v. [read post]
