Search for: "STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY"
Results 81 - 100
of 509
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2019, 3:35 am
Those could have been Starbucks coins. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 1:10 pm
Think of Starbucks coffee cup logo, McDonald’s yellow arch, or Coca-Cola; all are commonly recognized trademarks used to associate the company with their respective goods or service. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 1:22 pm
After nearly a decade of litigation, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Elihu Berle ruled in March that companies which sell coffee, like Starbucks, failed to show that coffee does not cause cancer; therefore, they must place cancer warnings on lattes and post warnings in their stores. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 3:16 pm
Whether or not someone might use cryptocurrency to, say, buy a cup of coffee at Starbuck’s, Ohio residents, at least, may now use bitcoin to pay their state taxes. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 9:15 am
And Starbucks has promoted fair trade coffee, marriage equality and racial justice more or less successfully. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 6:19 am
A few years ago, hedge fund Pershing Square—which popped up on Oct. 9 with a 1.1 percent stake in coffee company Starbucks—went after retailer J.C. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 4:50 pm
Starbucks, holding that the coffee behemoth must compensate employees for “all hours worked,” including brief periods of off-the-clock work. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 1:00 am
Victor: They’ve had their coffee, but they haven’t been tired out by everyone that’s been there all day. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:03 pm
Probably less generally known is that Cranor was one of the founders of an organization, the Council for Education and Research on Toxics (CERT), which recently was the complaining party in a California case in which CERT sought money damages for Starbucks’ failure to label each cup of coffee sold as known to the State of California as causing cancer.6 Having a so-called not-for-profit corporation can also be pretty handy, especially when it holds itself out as a scientific… [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 3:29 am
For example, if you’ve decided to open a coffee shop, it’s fairly easy to determine that the name “Starbucks” is not an option. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
Last Thursday, July 26, the California Supreme Court issued an opinion concluding that coffee retailer Starbucks must pay its employees for off-the-clock duties that take several minutes per shift. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 11:28 am
" But in 2015, the beverage company decided to create a line of "Grumpy Cat Roasted Coffee," which was not in the original deal. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 3:16 am
., Opposition No. 91200616 and Cancellation No. 92053622 [Consolidated petition for cancellation of a registration for, and opposition to registration of, the mark J5 for various goods in classes 3, 14, 16, 18, 21, and 28, including books in the field of entertainment and musical performances and musical toys on the grounds of nonuse and abandonment, and likelihood of confusion with and likely dilution of the registered mark JACKSON 5 for entertainment services].July 17, 2018 - 10 AM: In re… [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 10:58 pm
Starbucks, in which a California Superior Court judge rejected the evidence presented by coffee roasters and retailers to demonstrate that exposures to acrylamide in coffee were exempt from Proposition 65’s warning requirement. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 10:58 pm
Starbucks, in which a California Superior Court judge rejected the evidence presented by coffee roasters and retailers to demonstrate that exposures to acrylamide in coffee were exempt from Proposition 65’s warning requirement. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 11:15 am
As everyone now knows, Starbucks failed to persuade the California trial judge that coffee, acrylamide and all, should come under the statute’s safe harbor provisions. [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:44 pm
Plaintiff Jacob Davis brought a putative class action against International Coffee and Tea, LLC (the company that operates Coffee Bean and Tea Leaf) alleging that the company’s tip pooling policy violated California’s Labor Code section 351. [read post]
28 May 2018, 3:26 pm
The Court ruled that Starbucks and other companies failed to show there was no significant risk from acrylamide produced in the coffee roasting process and that cancer warning labels must be placed on their products in California. [read post]
20 May 2018, 10:54 am
(Star Tribune) via hotair.com Well this is going to make some Starbucks unusable. [read post]
19 May 2018, 6:30 am
The Seattle-based coffee company highlighted the fact that all of its dealings were in line with Dutch law and the guidelines established by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). [read post]
