Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF I. B. W."
Results 81 - 100
of 2,227
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2018, 5:55 pm
Family Code section 850(a), (b) & (c). [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 10:42 am
The trial judge showed no interest in obtaining an answer to these questions. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:39 am
Instead, the state based its prosecutions on identity information entered on federal and state tax-withholding documents (the W-4 and K-4 forms, respectively). [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:28 am
Along with Sheff’s examples, I’m interested in the role of registration in the multifactor confusion test, as well as how to reconcile registration w/dilution, which was supposedly designed to prevent interference w/marks even on unrelated goods/services. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 8:47 am
Aesthetic functionality is already a hybrid b/t protectability and user interests. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 10:55 am
SCt understood that it needed to deal w/ ability of wealthy individuals to use tort law in Southern states to drive hated news organizations out of business b/c they hated them. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 9:23 am
” Instead: be tempered, esp. w/public health interest. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 10:31 am
At noon, EST, by operation of the Twentieth Amendment, George W. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 3:10 pm
The Court stated that, “[i]f the petitioner has any interest at all he is entitled to invoke the court’s protection. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 4:21 pm
§ 5845(a); or (B) any other federal, state, or local offense punishable by a term of imprisonment exceeding twenty years; (2) Grade B Violations — conduct constituting any other federal, state, or local offense punishable by a term of imprisonment exceeding one year; (3) Grade C Violations — conduct constituting (A) a federal, state, or local offense punishable by a term of imprisonment of one year or less; or (B) a violation of… [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
Clarified and a regulation instead of a directive: That’s important b/c a directive is transposed into national law, w/27 potential different means. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 5:35 pm
Privately negotiated w/o input from public or public interest groups. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:18 pm
I still prefer the more captivating story, however unlikely, that Mossad poisoned him. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 9:06 am
It doesn’t matter where I get things from, it’s important where I t [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 12:04 pm
Problem I have is when FTC says we also have to provide them with info so they can choose whether to interact w/ad: prevents exposure to truthful speech just b/c it’s annoying. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 4:20 pm
Hilaire, Attorney & Counselor at Law, PLLC, 20 W. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:32 pm
(I couldn’t find a book by that name but this looks interesting.) [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
I explained in my Friday post that while step (b) for removal overlaps substantially with the substantive immunity question, step (b) sets a lower threshold. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
George W. [read post]
