Search for: "STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. E. W." Results 81 - 100 of 364
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2018, 2:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
Rather, the decision rests on the theory that: "Rutgers has a core commitment to diversity, promising 'everyone joining us as a student, professor, or member of staff [that] [w]e at Rutgers will accept you for who you are. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 5:16 am by Eugene Volokh
And of course this New Jersey precedent is likely to be cited to and by other state courts in the future. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:39 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court victory in the 2014 ‘Hobby Lobby’ case is preparing to ask the high court to review a New Jersey Supreme Court decision barring churches from receiving taxpayer-funded historic-preservation grants. [read post]
8 May 2018, 7:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
A description of applicable federal laws and policies, and applicable state laws, including new or proposed federal or state legislation or policies5. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am by Dan Carvajal
Revenues may rise if property values do, or if new property is placed into service, but under rate caps, local government officials are limited in their ability to engineer a conscious tax increase. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 7:44 am by Robert Manchel
There are only three chapter 13 standing trustee’s administering cases in the entire State of New Jersey. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:09 am by Eliana Baer
Indeed, the right against self-incrimination, although not protected by the New Jersey constitution, is deeply rooted in our jurisprudence and codified in N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-19, which states that every person in New Jersey “has a right to refuse to disclose in an action…any matter that will incriminate him or expose him to penalty…” Both the United States Supreme Court and our New Jersey courts have… [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:09 am by Eliana Baer
Indeed, the right against self-incrimination, although not protected by the New Jersey constitution, is deeply rooted in our jurisprudence and codified in N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-19, which states that every person in New Jersey “has a right to refuse to disclose in an action…any matter that will incriminate him or expose him to penalty…” Both the United States Supreme Court and our New Jersey courts have… [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 3:05 am by John A. Gallagher
The defendant maintained that the settlement proceeds were tantamount to w-2 income.Treated Differently Than Other Employment-Related StatutesThe district court observed that the Third Circuit, the patron court of the district courts located in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware and the Virgin Islands, and yet to rule on the issue. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:33 am by Eugene Volokh
In the course of ruling that the Establishment Clause allowed New Jersey to extend that public benefit to all its citizens regardless of their religious belief, we explained that a State “cannot hamper its citizens in the free exercise of their own religion. [read post]
8 May 2017, 8:20 am
”       The court went on to explain that[w]e now reverse and remand to the Parole Board. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:03 pm by Bill Marler
As a result, HDOH ordered this product embargoed (not to be sold, purchased, or consumed) throughout the state, and the temporary closure of all Genki Sushi restaurants on Oahu and Kauai. [read post]