Search for: "STATE v ALDEN"
Results 81 - 100
of 192
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2013, 9:40 am
Case Name: CHARLES FREDERICK SECREST v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 7:39 pm
FMC, 535 U.S. at 764 (quoting Alden, 527 U.S. at 756). [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:59 pm
S., at 30– 31; see Alden v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 1:28 pm
McLAURY v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
Hearn v. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
In the 1999 case of Alden v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:49 am
McDaniel v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 11:44 pm
Oil States, 138 S. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 5:49 am
Several of his rulings eventually reached the Supreme Court on appeal, such as the Pentagon Papers case, United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2006, 10:23 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 5:07 am
Illinois State Bar Association: Vincent v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 9:32 am
Several more recent Supreme Court decisions have strengthened those protections, including Blatchford v. ative Village of Noatak (1991) and Alden v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 9:50 am
State; May v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 10:32 am
Alden, Senior Assistant Appellate Counsel. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:55 am
Maryland v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:04 am
Affirmed.Case Name: JESSY MICHAEL DENNIS v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 12:04 pm
Marshal v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 4:02 am
This suggests that in such situations the State may attempt to have the case dismissed on the grounds that it immune from suit in federal court for alleged violations of Title VII in view of the rulings by the Supreme Court of the United States in Kimel v Board of Regents, 528 U.S. 62 and Alden v Maine, 527 U.S. 706, cases involving employees suing their state employer in federal court for alleged violations of, respectively, the Age… [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 3:19 pm
Alden v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 12:11 pm
" Alden, 527 U.S., at 730; see id., at 736 ("[T]he bare text of the Amendment is not an exhaustive description of the States' constitutional immunity from suit"). [read post]
