Search for: "STATE v. AMARAL" Results 81 - 100 of 636
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2023, 10:26 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  In my columns, I cited with approval a two-part Verdict series by Illinois Law's Dean Vikram Amar and his colleague Professor Jason Mazzone. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am by Randy E. Barnett
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:59 am by Josh Blackman
I think the better answer, as Akhil Amar has written, is that this federalism provision prevents the federal government from interfering with state established churches. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 5:49 am by Rebecca Hamilton
That was the case for Abrham’s father, Professor Meareg Amare. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
In addition, Wilson was one of the main authors of the 1790 Pennsylvania constitution—another surprisingly neglected fact about him, which bears on Moore v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
My friend and case-book co-editor Akhil Reed Amar believes that it is “nonsensical” to argue that there was the slightest merit to the Southern argument for secession as presented in 1860-61. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:00 am by Timothy Bonis
Michael Young cites the Court’s 1995 ruling in United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  This process of judicial nullification culminated in Plessy v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 10:56 am by Jason Mazzone
” As Akhil Amar, Vik Amar and Steve Calabresi explain in their must-read amicus brief in Moore, however, Article I’s Election Clause didn’t originate with the Constitution. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
(For more evidence of lawyerly shabbiness in earlier stages of Moore v. [read post]