Search for: "STATE v. LOCKHART" Results 81 - 100 of 136
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2013, 2:04 pm by Wells Bennett
Cross-examining Bogdan is the responsibility of CDR Andrea Lockhart. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
The first is United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 10:16 am
Case Name: Concerned Citizens of Spring Creek Ranch v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:50 am by Amy Howe
” At The Narrowest Grounds, Asher Steinberg previews next month’s oral arguments in Lockhart v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 4:59 am by Kevin Jon Heller
  Indeed, the Sixth Circuit specifically held as much in a well-known 1992 case, United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 1:44 am
TOM, J.P., SULLIVAN, WILLIAMS, BUCKLEY, MALONE, JJ. *1 (Cite as: 2007 WL 764515, *1 (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.)) ... 7. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:14 am by Lyle Denniston
In the other new criminal case, Lockhart v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:07 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Relying on Matter of Campbell v Pesce (60 NY2d 165), the Court held thatAlthough the constitutional Double Jeopardy Clauses do not bar a second prosecution where the prior judgment of conviction has been vacated upon the defendant's motion or appeal because of an error in the proceedings (see Lockhart v Nelson, 488 US 33, 38; United States v Tateo, 377 US 463, 465-467), the 2003 judgment of conviction has never been vacated. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 11:13 am by James Bickford
Arguing for the State of Oregon, Attorney General John Kroger began by asserting that the Ninth Circuit erred when it held that Arizona v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 11:36 pm
In his recent Lockhart lecture, published in this journal as "The Constitution in the National Surveillance State," Jack Balkin warns of a "new form of governance" that he calls "The National Surveillance State. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
In the Anheuser-Busch case, the importation from the USA of bottled beer under the BUDWEISER mark for use and sale in US military and diplomatic establishments within the UK did not entitle the plaintiff to establish what Lord Oliver later stated was the first element of a passing off claim. [read post]